PortfoliosLab logo
GPN vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GPN and ^GSPC is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

GPN vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global Payments Inc. (GPN) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GPN:

-0.71

^GSPC:

0.44

Sortino Ratio

GPN:

-0.79

^GSPC:

0.79

Omega Ratio

GPN:

0.88

^GSPC:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

GPN:

-0.39

^GSPC:

0.48

Martin Ratio

GPN:

-1.84

^GSPC:

1.85

Ulcer Index

GPN:

14.51%

^GSPC:

4.92%

Daily Std Dev

GPN:

38.67%

^GSPC:

19.37%

Max Drawdown

GPN:

-68.18%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

GPN:

-62.03%

^GSPC:

-7.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPN achieves a -27.97% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's -3.77% return. Over the past 10 years, GPN has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 5.05%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.46% annualized return.


GPN

YTD

-27.97%

1M

-3.29%

6M

-27.04%

1Y

-25.57%

5Y*

-13.55%

10Y*

5.05%

^GSPC

YTD

-3.77%

1M

7.44%

6M

-5.60%

1Y

8.37%

5Y*

14.12%

10Y*

10.46%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GPN vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GPN is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GPN is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GPN is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GPN is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GPN is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GPN is 22
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GPN vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Payments Inc. (GPN) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GPN Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPN and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

GPN vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPN drawdown since its inception was -68.18%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPN and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GPN vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Global Payments Inc. (GPN) has a higher volatility of 22.93% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 6.82%. This indicates that GPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...